A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek to develop their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by building a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result spots are topic to rigorous controls beneath European and Irish environmental law. In their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments could have Long lasting ecological effects, especially in a delicate coastal surroundings like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, where sights of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location turned Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as audience sought to understand the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all operates are performed based on Skilled tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, usually do not change the underlying details.
The case has also raised broader questions on how scheduling disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your predicament a large number of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now a lot more contentious.
The René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Stay along with each other very long following the legal expenditures are already compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend over and above that address. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the significance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for example environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. No matter whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to Just about the most intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin lately.